The art one finds at the Münster Sculpture Project
today, which was co-curated by Brigitte Franzen, Kasper Konig, and Carina
Plath, is it seems of a more modest stature than that which has appeared in
some of the Projects earlier exhibitions. These newer, more modest works carry
a larger political, and social payload. Raising the
question, is a bigger, grander installation really better?
The
story goes that when George Rickey placed his kinetic sculpture in the city of
So what one learns quickly from the art, and the
Archive of the Münster Sculpture Project, on display at the museum, is that the
artists and their work does have a formative power on
the city.
One
example, Thomas Schütte’s Kirschensaüle ‘Cherry Column’, the color of
which reflected the popular color of auto paint at the time, was constructed in
1987 overlooking a parking lot full of cars, garbage receptacles, bikes and
bike racks. Over time city officials,
noting the number of tourist and other visitors who were searching out the Cherries, thought they should clean up the site to help
improve the city’s image. Thus today
Schütte’s Cherries can be found on a sanitized public square, the
HarseWinkelplatz, a standard gray cobblestone plaza surrounded by cafes and a
granite fountain, which was donated to the city by private investors. Once again the city itself was transformed by
an artist’s intervention. In this case
Schütte, invited to participate in the 2007 Project, and seeing the site of his
artwork transformed, defiantly reacted to this sterilization of the surrounding
landscape by creating a ‘Museum of the Future’, “Which stands in contradiction
to the architecturally clustered plaza”. Schütte known for his attention to
craftsmanship and materials that evoke traces of the artist’s hand, chooses
instead three sterile, industrial elements glass, steel and plastic to create
his Modell für ein Museum. He places this construction over the plaza’s
granite fountain, thus encapsulating this architectural form and containing its
functionality. Further, his benches assembled along the exterior of the
structure compel visitors to sit with their backs to the fountain, directing
their
view away from it, separating the fountain from
public access and its site. In this way
he comments on how works of art can be removed from the world they inhabit,
confined in the museum as in a sanitized art graveyard.
What
Michael Asher has done over the course of successive Münster Sculpture Project
manifestations, since his 1977 project Installation Münster /Caravan was
conceived, is to place a caravan in each of 15 chosen spots throughout the
city, during the course of the exhibition. The caravan as such becomes an icon
of domestic life ‘on the road’. As a metaphor for, one who’s
desire is to bring one’s world along with them, the caravan comes to symbolize
a ‘bürgerlich’ provincial thinking, like that which triggered the
demonstrations against the Münster Project at its inception. The work, through its photographic
documentation, reveals the changes, which have occurred in the city over the 30
years and four successive manifestations of the Project. The pedestrian nature of the work belies its
significance as a marker of time and location.
The art work, which is moved every Monday to each of its successive 15
locations, can sometimes be found locked in its garage, because the cityscape
has altered so significantly, that the next location no longer exists to
accommodate it.
Silke Wagner’s Münster's Geschichte von Unten /The History of Münster from Below stands in front
of the city Stadthaus ‘City Offices’. It
is conceived as a monument to Paul Wulf, who at age seven, and one of four
children, was removed from his home.
Like Michael Asher’s displaced caravan, Wulf could no longer be
accommodated within the apartment inhabited by his growing family, or so it was
claimed by the Nazi government of Münster.
Thus he was moved to an asylum for the mentally ill, and there
sterilized by the Nazis. During his life
he fought legal battles for recognition and compensation against war crimes and
became, despite his small physical stature, an icon of resistance to overreaching
governmental injustices. The artist
covers Wulf’s body, with various historical documents, in the style of an
information kiosk, these chronicle political and social struggle, against
nuclear energy and the need for adequate housing. Through Wagner’s collaboration with the
Umweltzentrum Archiv Münster ‘Environmental Archive Society’, she further opens
the potential for communication of these ideas beyond Wulf’s body to the world
via the internet.
Overall
these works are not monumental in scale, but reflect a more human sized format
suitable for individual reflection. For
example, Isa Genzken’s Untitled umbrella
compositions feel very much homemade. Her project is positioned adjoining the
Überwasserkirche and being divided into 12 installations, has adopted a
‘stations of the cross’ metaphor for their assemblage. She creates a powerful statement about
childhood and adolescence in an age where children of affluence tend to ‘have
it all’. In this work
children’s toys, dolls and various accessories are scared with paint or
dismembered, seemingly a metaphor for neglect, or childhood afflictions like
attention deficit disorder, resulting from excess and information overload.
Maria
Pask’s
At the Erbdrostenhof, a former palace in baroque
style, ‘where Richard Serra placed twenty-four tons of steel’ during
the Münster Sculpture Project of 1987, Andreas Siekmann’s Trickle Down, Der
öffentlice Raum im Zeitalter seiner Privatisierung ‘Public Space in the Era
of its Privatization’, makes an equally significant statement using more modest
means. Siekmann shreds the fiberglass
cows, bears, geese and other figures which have become pervasive in urban
centers in Germany and beyond, due to the marketing efforts of cities. These elements are assembled in one large
ball-like structure, which is meant to reclaim the urban landscape, and offset
the privatization of public space. Thus
Siekmann opens for dialogue the notion that these corporate sponsored figures
are usurping public spaces, which are perhaps better served by the
individualized statements of visual artists.
The
majority of the works in Münster Sculpture Project of 2007 reflect an intimate
format, which contrasts with popular interest in works of epic proportions.
However figuratively speaking, these works are larger than life in their power
to convey timeless subjects and sage commentary. This raises the questions, is
bigger really better and can art and ideas transform societies and social
consciousness? Clearly in the case of
the Münster Sculpture Project the modest has found its place and has succeeded
in making a large impact.

Other
projects to consider, which are on view in Germany at this time are Documenta
in Kassel, curated by Ruth Noack and Made in Germany hosted at three
separate venues in the city of Hannover.
Documenta
lack luster at best, does have its high points. The show stopper by veteran choreographer
Trisha Brown, is a 1971 installation called Floor
of the Forest. A brilliant
installation and 20 minute performance contained within a quadratic web of rope
and attached clothing, which the 3 performers slowly navigate, donning a
spectrum of shirts, pants, and sweaters as they move along through the
piece. The artwork takes it name from a
symphony of ever changing shadows, which play upon the floor.
Another
memorable piece was a multiple channel video installation, The Lightning
Testimonies of 2007 by Amar Kanwar from
Like
the cherry on top of Schütte’s column in Münster, the real treat was in
Hannover with the three-part exhibition entitled, "Made in
, Taken from Sculpture
Projects Muester 07, Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König, Köln
Kimberly Marrero is an Independent Art Advisor and Curator who also serves as an Arts
Educator at the
Ron Rocco
is an Independent Curator, and multimedia artist who has shown in numerous
venues worldwide and lives and works in